The debate over introducing a mandatory composting program versus maintaining voluntary participation in residential waste management - (Reading > Viewpoints)

The debate over introducing a mandatory composting program versus maintaining voluntary participation in residential waste management

This pracrice is for Pro Members Only

Read the following message.

The city council's proposal to implement mandatory composting for all residential properties has sparked intenLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Choose the best option according to the information.

The main argument for mandatory composting according to Sarah Chen is . Robert Martinez's primary concern about the program is . Dr. Emily Watson's position on the issue can be described as . James Thompson's alternative suggestion focuses on . The fundamental disagreement between the opposing sides centers on .

The following is a comment by a reader. Complete the comment by choosing the best option to fill in each blank.

The city's proposed composting program seems . While I understand the environmental benefits, I think . Dr. Watson's statistics about other cities' experiences are interesting, but they don't address . The most convincing argument in the article is . Before making this program mandatory, the city should first .

Back to Questions