School Lunch Program Reform

improved test scores in all subjects.

better behavior and focus from students.

reduced absenteeism among students.

increased parent participation in school activities.

the lack of kitchen facilities in schools.

the quality of food being served.

the high cost of implementation.

the shortage of cafeteria staff.

provides only organic food options.

offers different payment options based on income.

employs professional chefs in every school.

receives government funding for all meals.

serving expensive meals.

having long waiting times.

offering unhealthy menu options.

employing untrained staff.

was too expensive to maintain.

provided multiple benefits beyond nutrition.

failed to attract student participation.

required extensive staff training.

have reached a consensus on the solution.

reject the need for any changes.

agree changes are needed but disagree on approach.

want to eliminate school lunch programs entirely.